how to extract amphetamine from the pseudoephedrine?

[8n398k20k280]

how to extract amphetamine from the pseudoephedrine?

 

[MadHatter]

You don't. There is no methamphetamine in pseudo that you can extract. You need to convert the pseudo to meth through a chemical process, a synthesis.
The synthesis is described under the section "amphetamines" on this forum. Which you would have found if you bothered to even search it before you posted yet another question.

 

[8n398k20k280]

You don't. There is no methamphetamine in pseudo that you can extract. You need to convert the pseudo to meth through a chemical process, a synthesis.
The synthesis is described under the section "amphetamines" on this forum. Which you would have found if you bothered to even search it before you posted yet another question.

DocXExcuse me, Professor, who is a little arrogant

 

[8n398k20k280]

You don't. There is no methamphetamine in pseudo that you can extract. You need to convert the pseudo to meth through a chemical process, a synthesis.
The synthesis is described under the section "amphetamines" on this forum. Which you would have found if you bothered to even search it before you posted yet another question.

DocXIf I asked this question, isn't it clear that I didn't understand the whole synthesis process? "DocX" I'm sorry I'm not a born chemist to understand. I think this forum is to help others who are new to this field and would like more help from innate chemists like you!

 

[MadHatter]

I am in no way an "innate chemist". I am also a beginner. But my critique isn't that you don't understand, it's that you didn't even TRY.

First of all, search the forum for the syntheses you are looking for. BEFORE asking questions. It's a simple search, has nothing to do with being a chemist.

Then, when you find it, read it. If there are things there you don't understand, google them. If you get stuck, ask about those specific things.

If you ask, like you did, "How do you make amphetamine?" the answer is "Read the goddamn synth description on the forum!".
However, if you ask "Sorry, I read this synth description *link*, and I don't understand what it means to basify the solution" (or some other specified part of the synth), you can get tips and answers. I for one would happily help you with whatever knowledge I have. You can find several examples of this on this forum.

It's ok to not know chemistry. It's not ok to be lazy and not even try yourself. And if you don't know how to search a forum or ask questions that people can actually answer, you need to learn that first. If you're not prepared to do that, noone can help you and this is not for you.

At least that's my five cents.

 

[MadHatter]

By the way, here's a simile to help you understand:

Let's say this was a forum about building houses of different kinds. In it there is a lot of floor plans and description on how to build a lot of different houses, among those one called "How to build a town house".
Then you pop in and ask the question "How do you build a town house?".

You can see how that can be perceived as just a little, little bit stupid, right?

However, if you asked
"Sorry, I read the description on how to build a town house, but in it there's a lot of mentions about "2 by 4's". I don't understand what "2 by 4's" is. I tried to google it, but can't find any info. Can someone please explain?", people would of course help you.
I know I would.

 

[ACAB]

I can extract amphetamine from pseudoephedrine? How does it work?
Please tell me @8n398k20k280.

At least that's my five cents.

DocXI see this quite similarly, only consider that new user of this forum possibly not exactly know what to look for, or choose the wrong search terms and then find meanwhile many new posts like this one, without real content. For the sake of clarity, should all tutorials from experts, or from experts declared good, in a separate category, where no one else can open topics, or these tutorials are all pinned, so that you can find them better without use the search function. The multitude of these contributions shows that a change in the area would perhaps be appropriate, because I do not believe that all really run around with the board before the head and simply submit they completely senseless comment here. I think there are just too many impressions that act at once, you have to take a good breath to find an overview.
And then puts out that cry for help to find a beginning. But that clutters up the forum.

Now we have 10 cents in the ring bag

 

[MadHatter]

For the sake of clarity, should all tutorials from experts, or from experts declared good, in a separate category, where no one else can open topics, or these tutorials are all pinned, so that you can find them better without use the search function.

PennywiseDefinately! I posted this suggestion in Heisenbergs thread on the new forum style.
Although in this particular case, it doesn't apply. He could have typed the exact question he posted here into the search bar and gotten the right result.

And honestly, performing chemical syntheses without a chemical education is not a realistic undertaking if one is not curious, enterprising and intelligent enough to find any information by oneself and connecting dots. Then it's just as well to return to the darknet markets and buy the product.