- Joined
- Jan 1, 2023
- Messages
- 64
- Reaction score
- 74
- Points
- 18
It's very strange what's going on here. You post a method and instead of a stimulating discussion, the first comment comes from an apparently confused guy who can do everything much better and faster. How he does it ?, he doesn't tell us this retard.
Then the next one shows up and wants to badmouth the method via pseudo-scientific contributions and remote analysis and thereby acquire customers for his synthesis business, shady.
And finally, Prof. Smart-ass, posts some cynical comments and provides exactly 0 constructive suggestions.
We're not in court here, I don't have to prove anything. The purity of the sample from the academic version was carried out in a professional laboratory with NMR spectra, Infrared and UV spectra, electrospray ionisation mass spectra etc.
I'll think twice about posting anything at all, so it's pointless. In the good old hive forum, a completely different style was cultivated. What a pity.
Then the next one shows up and wants to badmouth the method via pseudo-scientific contributions and remote analysis and thereby acquire customers for his synthesis business, shady.
And finally, Prof. Smart-ass, posts some cynical comments and provides exactly 0 constructive suggestions.
We're not in court here, I don't have to prove anything. The purity of the sample from the academic version was carried out in a professional laboratory with NMR spectra, Infrared and UV spectra, electrospray ionisation mass spectra etc.
I'll think twice about posting anything at all, so it's pointless. In the good old hive forum, a completely different style was cultivated. What a pity.
↑View previous replies…
K-CyanideDon't take personally what the people here post, some of them are smart-asses other know what they talk but would rather make money on their synthesis methods and they don't understand what sharing of knowledge means.
Post your reactions and methods, we can all share and learn from it.
ResearcherrGo to School and u teach there.or read books
Researcherr@Researcherr
thank you for your kind words. You are right, you should just ignore these guys, though on some days not so easy *grin`*.
By the way, look what this joker answered you. There I make a remote diagnosis: mental disorder in an advanced stage. Take care.
K-CyanideFor the dumb ones, my signature is specifically for the slick asses who write me in private messages with questions about how to make 10 kg at a time, some of them apparently think that I owe them what. My signature means that I'm not going to help fucking factories for free. You need to be able to take criticism to the point, do you think that your work is of value to the community? No, it does not, in neighboring topics and the output gets higher and the purity is clearly, even without analysis, higher. If you think that you have done something unique, then you are mistaken.
K-CyanideKeep up your posts. Haters gonn hate anyway lol.
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2023
- Messages
- 22
- Reaction score
- 9
- Points
- 3
- By Researcherr
It's very strange what's going on here. You post a method and instead of a stimulating discussion, the first comment comes from an apparently confused guy who can do everything much better and faster. How he does it ?, he doesn't tell us this retard.
Then the next one shows up and wants to badmouth the method via pseudo-scientific contributions and remote analysis and thereby acquire customers for his synthesis business, shady.
And finally, Prof. Smart-ass, posts some cynical comments and provides exactly 0 constructive suggestions.
We're not in court here, I don't have to prove anything. The purity of the sample from the academic version was carried out in a professional laboratory with NMR spectra, Infrared and UV spectra, electrospray ionisation mass spectra etc.
I'll think twice about posting anything at all, so it's pointless. In the good old hive forum, a completely different style was cultivated. What a pity.
Post your reactions and methods, we can all share and learn from it.
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2023
- Messages
- 33
- Reaction score
- 20
- Points
- 8
Don't take personally what the people here post, some of them are smart-asses other know what they talk but would rather make money on their synthesis methods and they don't understand what sharing of knowledge means.
Post your reactions and methods, we can all share and learn from it.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2023
- Messages
- 64
- Reaction score
- 74
- Points
- 18
Don't take personally what the people here post, some of them are smart-asses other know what they talk but would rather make money on their synthesis methods and they don't understand what sharing of knowledge means.
Post your reactions and methods, we can all share and learn from it.
thank you for your kind words. You are right, you should just ignore these guys, though on some days not so easy *grin`*.
By the way, look what this joker answered you. There I make a remote diagnosis: mental disorder in an advanced stage. Take care.
It's very strange what's going on here. You post a method and instead of a stimulating discussion, the first comment comes from an apparently confused guy who can do everything much better and faster. How he does it ?, he doesn't tell us this retard.
Then the next one shows up and wants to badmouth the method via pseudo-scientific contributions and remote analysis and thereby acquire customers for his synthesis business, shady.
And finally, Prof. Smart-ass, posts some cynical comments and provides exactly 0 constructive suggestions.
We're not in court here, I don't have to prove anything. The purity of the sample from the academic version was carried out in a professional laboratory with NMR spectra, Infrared and UV spectra, electrospray ionisation mass spectra etc.
I'll think twice about posting anything at all, so it's pointless. In the good old hive forum, a completely different style was cultivated. What a pity.
↑View previous replies…
w2x3f5All people Want help free xD free they have on video xD
w2x3f5@w2x3f5 I would suggest ending the discussion and just let the other forum members decide what is of value to them and what is not.
I think a rivalry about who has the better methods is not in the spirit of the founders of this forum.
K-CyanideI told you everything about your method, the yield of the substance and impurities. And you don't need to tell someone if you can't see behind you.
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2023
- Messages
- 33
- Reaction score
- 20
- Points
- 8
For the dumb ones, my signature is specifically for the slick asses who write me in private messages with questions about how to make 10 kg at a time, some of them apparently think that I owe them what. My signature means that I'm not going to help fucking factories for free. You need to be able to take criticism to the point, do you think that your work is of value to the community? No, it does not, in neighboring topics and the output gets higher and the purity is clearly, even without analysis, higher. If you think that you have done something unique, then you are mistaken.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2023
- Messages
- 64
- Reaction score
- 74
- Points
- 18
For the dumb ones, my signature is specifically for the slick asses who write me in private messages with questions about how to make 10 kg at a time, some of them apparently think that I owe them what. My signature means that I'm not going to help fucking factories for free. You need to be able to take criticism to the point, do you think that your work is of value to the community? No, it does not, in neighboring topics and the output gets higher and the purity is clearly, even without analysis, higher. If you think that you have done something unique, then you are mistaken.
I think a rivalry about who has the better methods is not in the spirit of the founders of this forum.
@w2x3f5 I would suggest ending the discussion and just let the other forum members decide what is of value to them and what is not.
I think a rivalry about who has the better methods is not in the spirit of the founders of this forum.
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2023
- Messages
- 84
- Reaction score
- 71
- Points
- 18
It's very strange what's going on here. You post a method and instead of a stimulating discussion, the first comment comes from an apparently confused guy who can do everything much better and faster. How he does it ?, he doesn't tell us this retard.
Then the next one shows up and wants to badmouth the method via pseudo-scientific contributions and remote analysis and thereby acquire customers for his synthesis business, shady.
And finally, Prof. Smart-ass, posts some cynical comments and provides exactly 0 constructive suggestions.
We're not in court here, I don't have to prove anything. The purity of the sample from the academic version was carried out in a professional laboratory with NMR spectra, Infrared and UV spectra, electrospray ionisation mass spectra etc.
I'll think twice about posting anything at all, so it's pointless. In the good old hive forum, a completely different style was cultivated. What a pity.