I have been using and selling Speed since 1998, what has happened since 2018?is a-oil the problem?

[txe81]

Hi everyone, this topic is driving me and many other people who have been consumers for more than 20 years crazy.
What the hell is going on? The fast food I get these days, both in the markets and on the streets, gives me a purity percentage of over 90% in amphetamine. How is it possible that I can eat, sleep, not have the desire for sex or porn, not get chills or goosebumps with 0.5 grams...? I
have no chemical or pharmaceutical knowledge, so please, someone willing to help a good client, even an experienced consumer, who just wants to know what they're getting into and who yearns for the real speed.
From the year nineteen ninety eight to the year 2006 two types of amphetamine were consumed, which when analyzed they told us that it was amphetamine sulfate in two formats with two clear differences, one with a smell like green apple or freshly cut grass and another with a pinkish tone and also another with a yellowish tone, neither of them smelled like the paste that exists today and all of them by consuming a gram and a half or two grams you could go three or four days without sleeping, without eating, fucking, like an animal if you managed to get it hard... jaw that was uncontrollable, high concentration to learn and work, little tobacco consumption because of how comfortable and satiated you were... delayed orgasm, bulging eyes...
The little that is known is that these amphetamines were analyzed from time to time and the result was 91 something percent amphetamine sulfate and the rest was methanol. The rest of the formats, both the one that smelled like cut grass and the pinkish or yellowish color, did not come moist like what is available now and when analyzed, they also gave more than 90% purity.... Since 2018, the last really good thing I tried came from Epico SigmaOMicron markets, and something on the street...in those 20 years, it never affected my tolerance and the effects were very clear and strong. Now since then I only hear about a-oil, all the distributors are selling that stuff both in my country and in online markets...
well taking it for a test they also tell me it's 90% amphetamine too, but only amphetamine, no sulfate, no dextro, no hydro, no meth... and the expert association that analyses it says that all the users tell them the same thing, this paste is pure and you can eat, sleep etc... neither they who are an expert association from years ago in risk reduction nor I nor all my clients, friends, consumers nor I know hundreds understand what's going on with this amphetamine of today, what does it contain, can someone please explain it to me, years ago I was taking methamphetamine and I didn't know, maybe it was extra-amphetamine what we used to consume years ago and that's why simple amphetamine barely has any effect on us, what I do appreciate is that any local thug mixes the oil and it floods the streets and markets, so it no longer has the potency or the smell that I had years ago, can someone clarify all this for me? Can someone tell me where to buy the speed I remember, even if it's more expensive? Or if necessary, I'll do it myself, but what do I need to be able to do it?

 

[Frenki]

There used to be good amphetamine, but not anymore. Now it just keeps you awake — you’re not sleepy, not hungry, but also not euphoric. You can even eat, which is strange. There’s no sexual stimulation, no excitement — it just feels flat. The only thing it does is prevent sleep. Maybe it’s the L-isomer — could that be the reason? You really need to be lucky nowadays to find real, good amphetamine. Does anyone know what’s going on

 

[Osmosis Vanderwaal]

Your standing, looking down into the deepest black hole. In the bottom lies insanity. There's 3 dextromethamphetamines. I don't kno what they used to make ampheteamine from, but it's probably the same situation. They have the same structur exacly, as far as a phenyl ring attachedto a carbon chain( an ethyl) with a methyl on the alpha carbon that is chiral and an aminowith another methyl on it. (this is meth) Well, if it started life as pseudoephedrine/ephedrine, the beta carbon (the firt onw off the phenyl has a chiral side cain on it to on it also. So theres 1S,2S pseudo ephedrine the 1 and 2 represent the chiral carbons and S and R is the new D and L and 1S,2R ephedrine theres also 1S,2S )pseudo) and 1R,2S(ephed.). when you reduce this via a number of routes, the beta side chain is removed, so making meth from these products is to remove that first side chain and your done. Thats why it used to be so popular. super easy since you took that side chain of, theres only 1 chiral carbon left. S-methamphetamine or R-methamphestamineis the result. HERES THE IMPORTANT PART you took that first side chain off, but it had optical rotation (it was chiral, it turned) BUT THE CARBON DID NOT TURN, it is still twisting the spine right or left. so even though theres only 1 chiral carbon in meth, it's absolute orientation in spacei s a lot different depending on whether the precursor was a 1R or 1S (1R,2R twists right and then right again(it's optically active) but 1S,2R starts left and then jukes right, and so does the meth you make it into. The third kind of meth started as a non-chiral chemical, it just had a straight spine and you add a chiral alpha methl to make it meth. This is what I've found, after 100's of hours, and the facts are correct. the way a molecule fits into a receptor is very important and a slightly different shape would cause it to bind better in another receptor (there 5 types of dopamine rector at least 3 ht-5 receptors ect) occupying D-3 does have the same effect as D1. So these 3 definately real (R)D-methamphetamines have different affinities for different receptors. Also we should toss in a little mandela effect

 

[txe81]

Forgive my lack of knowledge and I really appreciate your answer, but it doesn't clarify my original doubts at all and I don't understand if you wanted to explain or resolve any of the doubts I have raised... if so, it's too technical a jargon for my brain, since I don't have chemistry or laboratory studies... or the translator is crazy, what is certain is that I do remember when Mandela left and even what his attitude was like, when something leaves such a mark and for so long, there is no false memory that can surpass it.

 

[Osmosis Vanderwaal]

I was being a bit technical there, mostly for others who read it, in essence, I'm agreing that the precursors that were used in the past made a stronger product, but as they were controlled / made illegal, production moved to another precursor or method that didn't have as much potency and required more effort to produce. As said below, tolerance is part of it. When I first started smoking meth again after an almost 20 year hiatus, it was clearly not as good as 20 years ago, but it did energize me enough to ride a bicycle 2 miles in 12 minutes, which is way way more than a 50 y/o man. who doesn't ride a bicycle is normally capable of. There was little in the way of euphoria. The meth of today is physically not the same as the meth of 20+ years ago. 20 years ago racemic meth was a concept that was foreign to cooks because ephedrine analogs are enantiomerically pure (you only get D meth from it) but meth made from p-2-p and the like is 50% virtually useless garbage. These 2 factors accoount for a 75% reduction in potency

 

[cisGafbdkodbkgbe]

Price came down, so quality goes down... Its the same w/ meth in the U.S. You can't tell one batch from the next just from looking at it. If you know how to recrystallize, you'll usually end up with something more pure. There's also a tolerance that can be built up in my opinion. So what used to keep you up all night no longer does, because you redose more often and dose everyday.